I think we should take this question into two perspectives.
Plato might contend that the forms which the person who creates the unnatural objects such as beds or ipods, has in their mind were passed down originally from the gods. So in the Platonic view it seems to follow that one can combine the substances necessary to create the "imperfect" worldly equivalent of the object but the person that fashions such an object would simply be an agent in selecting a preexisting godly form and combining the correct materials as best as her ability allows, not actually inventing the object only attempting to transfer the ideal form of the object from the world of ideas into the real world.
The second perspective, a more modern view, is one that was espoused during the regular A&P Class. Professor questioned human originality in the sense that it seems that the great majority of our "inventions" or "innovations" of any sort rarely result from a spontaneous new idea or understanding that one stumbles upon. I think that instead we tend to work in a sort of computer-like way in that we process millions if not billions of units of data and we are likely to group and combine data in a variety of different ways. The majority of our "new" ideas, inventions, and innovation are simply old experiences, thoughts, and innovations reassembled, recycled, and rearranged in order or alter or combine functions desirable to the new objects. this suggests that our thoughts aren't so much as original as they are complex and that they can be a deep reflection of the centuries of vital data that we of the future can so easily infuse into our brains for our own benefit. I think we are inventors but not in a spontaneous brand-new thought way but by combining and refining past ideas and understandings to come to a greater understanding and application to create objects whose function betters society.
Monday, January 30, 2012
Hey Everyone
My name is AJ Cote, I've been taking college courses for the past year liked college so much that I decided to finish my senior year early and enroll full time this spring at MCLA. So far I intend to study language, philosophy, and other social sciences. I enjoy talking about a large spectrum of topics, lately with larger than normal changes that are against our immediate and future interests, I like to talk about ways to progress our society and how to come together as people to pool resources and ideas to better our society. Philosophy is the type of class where we can fully engage our critical thinking and pool ideas to reach more develop conclusions that we would otherwise be unable to. I believe my opinion of art is certainly limited and I look forward to the chance to sculpt out a new understanding of the arts and to engage in critical philosophical discussions of all of our newly formed opinions and ways of understanding.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)